5 posts
Page 1 of 1
|
hi all
just a quick enquiry to ask if there is an advantage in using faderport to control studio one pro 3.5, over and above the CS18 (which i am soon to receive) i have seen several references to limitations of the CS18 in this regard......thoughts please?? ps i mostly need the CS18 to relieve my tennis elbow from mouse action while mixing....... cheers jb |
|
I have the CS, but not the faderport. Not sure of the limitations you are referencing, I like using it. Its semi retired right now since I got a Series 3 mixer. Maybe the comments of limitations are comparing the Series 3 to the CS? In that case, the Series 3 does have more features due to the hardware differences.
|
|
thnx matthew
since i dont really need much recording capability i get by with a focusrite saffire card and an expansion input rack...i can record stright into DAW with reasonable preamps and fatchannel on st 1 inputs if needed..so it is mainly for mixing. it was just something johnny geib mentioned about controlling folders and mixes etc..... but maybe it was about REMOTE??? |
|
ONE THING
it does seem strange that one cant call up different mix scenes from the cs18? |
|
If you are looking for the perfect combo.
$999 Quantum with less than 2ms RTL latency fastest available and expandable $999 FP 16 for mixing fast and small footprint -or- $2000 StudioLive III 16 channels controller and a <5 ms RTL latency Audio interface Track and Mix 16 XML recallable pristine preamps
My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS: Win 11 23H2, 18 Core i9: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 42" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24/16, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6, Sceptre 8, Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro latest, Test Platforms Reaper latest, Cakewalk latest |
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest