Well I listed FP8 and MCU.
Any controller that had fader I would guess. Did you mean Actual MCU or emulated MCU mode via FP8?
My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS: Win 11 23H2, 18 Core i9: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 42" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24/16, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6, Sceptre 8, Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro latest, Test Platforms Reaper latest, Cakewalk latest |
jpettit wroteWell I listed FP8 and MCU. Ok. I meant actual mcu for compatible control devices.
Studio One Pro v5, Notion 6, Nuendo 11, BitWig v3, Reaper v4, Ableton Live 8 Suite, iMac late 2015, Behringer Wing/x32-BigBoy/x32-rack all with Dante/aes67 and s16/sd16 stageboxes, Flow8, Waves x-wsg with SoundGrid server, Behringer X-Touch, X-Touch ONE, M-Air mr18, X-Air xr18, DP48, Hub4 and p16 monitor systems, TurboSound iQ-speakers, Motör 61, BCR-2000, FirePod 10, Apogee Ensemble, Alesis HD24, NI Komplete 12 Ultimate Collectors, Halion 6, True Temperament Frets on basses and guitars, Katana-100, DT-50, JSX, JCM800, Korg Kronos, Roland vk-7, Behringer Deepmind 12, Behringer Neutron
|
tyaudronis wroteroblof wroteHere is a video of the difference: Hi tyaudronis, When you say "that's about like the results I got with the FP8", what do you mean by "about"? Because I just tried the XML modification, I indeed get more accuracy (the FP8's faders are following S1's console faders) but the faders do not move with a full amplitude like in the video above; my faders move rather like fader 1 in that video, it does not go to the max and min. I'm doing a 1/8th triangle automation, and it reacts the same at a slow or a fast tempo. => Is that what you get too? Thank you! |
I got mine last wednesday, tested it with triangle waves at 1/4 130bpm, moves about between -10 and -30db. Doesn't seem to make a difference with adjusting fader speed....I think it's the same when it is at 1 vs 7?? So I also tried editing the xml file but again no difference?? help?
Asus p6t, i7 920@3,2ghz, 24gb ram, win7x64,120gb ssd system disc, 240gb ssd recording disc, 750gb hdd storage
Presonus studio one professional 3.5 x64, notion 4, progression 2 Monitor station v2, faderport 8 Firestudio 26x26, 2x firestudio project UAD 2 solo x2, waves, slate digital, toneboosters, melda production, melodyne editor mics from sennheiser, oktava, shure, audio-technica, akg and behringer |
The new s1 v3.5 has updated the fader speeds according to the release notes. I've not tested it yet...
Nutti wroteI got mine last wednesday, tested it with triangle waves at 1/4 130bpm, moves about between -10 and -30db. Doesn't seem to make a difference with adjusting fader speed....I think it's the same when it is at 1 vs 7?? So I also tried editing the xml file but again no difference?? help?
Studio One Pro v5, Notion 6, Nuendo 11, BitWig v3, Reaper v4, Ableton Live 8 Suite, iMac late 2015, Behringer Wing/x32-BigBoy/x32-rack all with Dante/aes67 and s16/sd16 stageboxes, Flow8, Waves x-wsg with SoundGrid server, Behringer X-Touch, X-Touch ONE, M-Air mr18, X-Air xr18, DP48, Hub4 and p16 monitor systems, TurboSound iQ-speakers, Motör 61, BCR-2000, FirePod 10, Apogee Ensemble, Alesis HD24, NI Komplete 12 Ultimate Collectors, Halion 6, True Temperament Frets on basses and guitars, Katana-100, DT-50, JSX, JCM800, Korg Kronos, Roland vk-7, Behringer Deepmind 12, Behringer Neutron
|
roblof wroteThe new s1 v3.5 has updated the fader speeds according to the release notes. I've not tested it yet... I'm already on 3.5
Asus p6t, i7 920@3,2ghz, 24gb ram, win7x64,120gb ssd system disc, 240gb ssd recording disc, 750gb hdd storage
Presonus studio one professional 3.5 x64, notion 4, progression 2 Monitor station v2, faderport 8 Firestudio 26x26, 2x firestudio project UAD 2 solo x2, waves, slate digital, toneboosters, melda production, melodyne editor mics from sennheiser, oktava, shure, audio-technica, akg and behringer |
I did the latest FP8 firmware update + Studio One 3.5.1, unfortunately it didn't change anything for me
I tried fader speed 4, 6 and 7 >> with a sinusoidal or a triangle automation, the faders don't reach their amplitude, their movement is very irregular Did someone have a better chance? |
This should definitely be sticky post!
I was wondering all the time why i wasn't been able to write automation properly in touch mode when the automation is already written. It because the update rate is too low!! Thank you guys for the solution. |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests