Page 2 of 2

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 8:53 pm
by rnaqvi
Other than being expandable, is there a quality difference to the fire studio project?


Yes, definitely. The converters are going to be better and the preamps are our latest technology with full recall-ability.

This thing is going to be a beast.

:thumbup:

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 1:25 am
by Daw Stew
who is developing the OEM USB 3.0 audio controller for this device?

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:34 am
by dgkenney
This looks very, very nice. My only complaint is that it would be perfect if one could route the ADAT input through the UC for fat channel fx processing. That would be awesome

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:00 pm
by andersekman
PreSonuSales2 wroteUnfortunately, no MIDI. This is simply due to the fact that in order to make this unit expandable with other units and capable of handling a large amount of inputs/outputs for its 1U rack space size, we had to sacrifice the real estate where a MIDI connection might go. However, this does not mean that there is no way to connect to external gear. There's still a multitude of ways to connect the Studio 192 to external gear, depending on the external gear.


Can you give some examples how to connect to external gear?

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:16 pm
by matthewgorman
dgkenney wroteThis looks very, very nice. My only complaint is that it would be perfect if one could route the ADAT input through the UC for fat channel fx processing. That would be awesome


As seen in another thread, you con. But you already knew that. For those not in that thread, the first 8 adat inputs can also have fat channel processing.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:19 pm
by matthewgorman
andersekman wrote
PreSonuSales2 wroteUnfortunately, no MIDI. This is simply due to the fact that in order to make this unit expandable with other units and capable of handling a large amount of inputs/outputs for its 1U rack space size, we had to sacrifice the real estate where a MIDI connection might go. However, this does not mean that there is no way to connect to external gear. There's still a multitude of ways to connect the Studio 192 to external gear, depending on the external gear.


Can you give some examples how to connect to external gear?


The line outs can be made mono to create a pipeline loop for external processing. There is a stereo in via spdif, and there is also adat inputs. The device has, technically speaking, 26 inputs and 32 outputs when paired with adat and spdif pres.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:50 am
by wdkbeats
Quick question:

Let's say I want to connect 3 pairs of monitors to Studio 192. Can I switch between them in Studio One?

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2015 8:33 am
by rnaqvi
You can switch monitors using uc surface. In the future we will offer this probably directly from studio one. But for now you will have the ability to do it using uc surface.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:16 pm
by M_ELLIOTT
Rick,
It would also be nice to utilize the talk back feature and the onboard DSP effects from within Studio One 3

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:51 am
by rnaqvi
Yes, totally. If you get a chance we have a special feature request section on the forum. The developers in Hamburg actually read it regularly. If you get a chance, please post your thought there as well.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:46 pm
by rokko101
Thanks for taking the time to post here Rick!

Studio 192 units are on their way to Peru. I look forward to test it and replace my trusty Firestudio units.

+1 To access talkback and DSP FX from SO3.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 2:42 pm
by wesley
You can access all the DSP Fat Channel functions in Studio One v3.1. It's just the talkback and reverb and delay that have not been integrated. But you can use your favorite reverb and delay plugin in S1 with your cue mixes right now and it works great.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2015 11:06 am
by rokko101
Thanks Wesley.

Maybe delay and reverb integration isn't as important from a real time point of view and plugins work just fine (albeit added latency).

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2015 4:00 pm
by wesley
Latency: it's like pre-delay you don't have to set :D

All kidding aside, time-based effects work great with Z-Mix in Studio One. The Studio 192 template has buses created and plugins already loaded to make it that much easier.

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 12:14 pm
by animalhouse
Can you process tracks from Studio One using the 192's DSP/Fat Channel, or is that strictly for the physical inputs?

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 8:33 pm
by rchan454
Sing4LTS wroteHere's a quick thought....
If the 192 is using the same digitally controlled Xmax pres as the RM's, and the RM's have multiple outputs like the 192; what are the odds that we see the same level of control and integration between the RM's and S1v3, as we are seeing advertised with the 192? :?: :D


Yes I would also like to know if this will ever be possible, I am trying to find a way to make this work in a home studio environment with CS18/RM16/Studio192 all working together... otherwise I may need to sell and get a 3 series mixer. But maybe that was the plan all along to sell more product :-)

Re: Studio 192

Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:22 am
by matthewgorman
Yes I would also like to know if this will ever be possible, I am trying to find a way to make this work in a home studio environment with CS18/RM16/Studio192 all working together... otherwise I may need to sell and get a 3 series mixer. But maybe that was the plan all along to sell more product :-)


What is it you are trying to do?