34 postsPage 2 of 2
1, 2
Jeff, please explain what each color stands for at the top row. I am struggling with this. Trying to relate it to the console.
I need more coffee!
Thanks.
:?

Bbd

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

OS: Win 10 x64 Home, Studio One Pro 4, Notion 6, Series III 24, Steinberg UR44, Haswell CPU: i7 4790k @ 4.4GHz, RAM: 16GB, Faderport 8/16, Cental Station Plus, Eris 3.5, ELAC Sub, Equator D5 monitors, Akai MPK261, Roland T6
User avatar
by jpettit on Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:39 am
Read page 6 of the handbook.
The two pictures there are trying to explain with pictures how mix effects can be used together.

In a nutshell a MIXFX can be stacked but not both apply to the same source.
Also see the special note in general diagram on page 2 with regards to pass through.

That is why I updated the Manual many months ago as I don’t feel that people generally understand architecturealy the MixFX are alway two components. A preamp component and bus summing component.

The bus summing side can be stacked just like plugins but the preamp component is exclusive to a source track.

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND.
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS:Win 10 64-bit, 12 Core i7: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 40" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24, Quantum, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6,Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro 4.0, Reaper 5.9, Sonar Platinum
User avatar
by jpettit on Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:06 pm
I add a Marcus's SOE 12 minute video on passthrough to the OP, which is one of the core misunderstandings.

Probably even a more fundamental miss-understanding, is people thinking a Mix-FX is a plugin that affects a signal at the point it is inserted when in fact it is a pair of processors, one at the bus and one at each and every channel feeding that bus.

Besides those two miss-understandings, the third one is simply they are mutually exclusive which means that they cannot share a source but can be stacked sequentially one as a summing process and one as a preamp process.

All this is demonstrated with diagrams on page 6 of the handbook.

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND.
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS:Win 10 64-bit, 12 Core i7: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 40" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24, Quantum, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6,Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro 4.0, Reaper 5.9, Sonar Platinum
User avatar
by Mac Money on Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:44 pm
Thank you so much!

George Ware
StudioOne v4.0.1 Pro 64bit
Pro-Tools 12.5 64bit
Waves DigiGrid IOS
Waves SoundGrid Server One
PreSonus CS18ai & BCR2000 Control Surface
Intel 6 Core i7 3.2Ghz.
Windows 10 Professional 64bit. v1803
Arturia KeyLab-61
URS, Waves Mercury+Studio Classics, EMI, Sonnox Oxford, Antares, Plugin Alliance, Nomad Factory,TL Labs, Serato, Massey, Komplete Ultimate 11, Arturia V-Collection 6, Lounge Lizard 4, Korg Collection, UVI Falcon, P&M VIP, Audio Damage, Melodyne Studio, VocAlign, Eventide, IL Vocodex, IL GrossBeat, Artillery 2, Softube and IKM Total Studio Max.
As of 23 May 18
User avatar
by oddie on Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:09 pm
I've not posted to the forum before but I thought that I would share my recent experience, for what it's worth. Having, in the past, used Harrison Mixbus and various Sonimus plugins for that warm analogue console / tape sound I thought I would give CTC-1 and Softube Tape a try, mainly for the convenience of the workflow of MixFX. Summary: I was very impressed by these MixFX.

Firstly, I conscientiously gain staged every track and bus to -18dB (0VU) and then made some minor adjustments to get a good balance (eg between individual drums in a kit). I had similar instruments and vocals routed to buses. This in itself produced a much better mix than I have achieved before - it really is worth gain staging!

I then routed all instrument/vocal buses to a bus containing Softube Tape, which was routed to the main outs on which I placed CTC-1. I had passthrough enabled on both MixFX.

Initially, I struggled to really hear what either MixFX was doing but by overcooking each one and then pulling back a bit I got the hang of it. I don't know whether this is the best way to use these MixFX and whether they were being fed at the best levels (the VU meter on Softube Tape registered consistently lower than Presonus VU meter (set at -18dB) instantiated on the bus).

However, here is the pay off. When I sat back and just listened to (rather than attempt to mix or analyse) the track, I realised that it sounded 'just right'. Very smooth and 'warm', perfect balance between tracks and everything could be heard clearly - possibly the best sound/blend/balance I have ever achieved.

I then realised that what I had listened to was simply the gain staged basic setup with Mix FX. I had no EQ, compression, reverb or effects on any tracks or buses and it sounded great. This meant that, for the first time ever, I could hear how I could apply those elements, as and if required, while listening to the whole mix (something I've never really managed to do before) and any EQ/compression/effects applied could be very subtle just to enhance where necessary, whereas previously I had been trying to beat tracks into submission with those tools to try and get everything to sit correctly).

Bottom line is that even if you just stick the MixFX in and not worry too much about how they work or whether what you're doing is really getting the most out of them, your mix can sound great with very little effort.

Hope people find this observation useful and I would welcome any comments on the workflow outlined above that might help me understand how to use these MixFX to best effect.
User avatar
by jpettit on Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:51 pm
Thanks for sharing. :thumbup:

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND.
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS:Win 10 64-bit, 12 Core i7: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 40" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24, Quantum, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6,Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro 4.0, Reaper 5.9, Sonar Platinum
User avatar
by oddie on Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:22 pm
Have been contemplating my post above.

The way I used the MixFX means, I think, that all tracks and instrument/vocal busses would get the Softube Tape treatment but only the bus with Softube Tape on, and the master bus, would be affected by CTC-1 (kind of like running a mix through a stereo summing console).

It may make more sense (or at least sound different) to reverse the MixFX so that all tracks and busses are affected by the CTC-1 and the master bus only is affected by Tape (like printing a mix to 2 track tape).

Perhaps a 'complete treatment' would be best effected by using Tape as a VST plug in on all busses (possibly all tracks) and using CTC-1 on the master so that all tracks could receive both console shaping and tape simulation.

Can a Mix FX be 'bounced' to audio (on individual tracks) so that, for example, the Tape treatment could be 'printed' and then the 'printed' audio be run through CTC-1?

Would be grateful to receive any thoughts from anyone on the above.

In the meantime I will experiment with different routings and report back my findings if they prove to be of interest.
User avatar
by jpettit on Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:22 pm
oddie wroteHave been contemplating my post above.

The way I used the MixFX means, I think, that all tracks and instrument/vocal busses would get the Softube Tape treatment but only the bus with Softube Tape on, and the master bus, would be affected by CTC-1 (kind of like running a mix through a stereo summing console).

It may make more sense (or at least sound different) to reverse the MixFX so that all tracks and busses are affected by the CTC-1 and the master bus only is affected by Tape (like printing a mix to 2 track tape).

Perhaps a 'complete treatment' would be best effected by using Tape as a VST plug in on all busses (possibly all tracks) and using CTC-1 on the master so that all tracks could receive both console shaping and tape simulation.

Can a Mix FX be 'bounced' to audio (on individual tracks) so that, for example, the Tape treatment could be 'printed' and then the 'printed' audio be run through CTC-1?

Would be grateful to receive any thoughts from anyone on the above.

In the meantime I will experiment with different routings and report back my findings if they prove to be of interest.

Good point on the swap Mix-FX idea.
If you read the manual here you will see it is an either or situation even with pass-through on.
Good question on the ability to print one of the Mix-FX in order to apply both to each individual channel.
As you see by this Signal flow diagram viewtopic.php?f=153&t=8684 you would get the Master Mix-FX + the Sub Bus Mix on a Track Stem render and only the Subbus Mix-FX on a Channel Stem render. Of course, you would want to do this printing before added Insert FX into the mix and turn off your second layer Mix-FX crosstalk if applying it to all individual channels with the printed Mix-FX's.

Worth giving it a try.

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND.
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS:Win 10 64-bit, 12 Core i7: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 40" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24, Quantum, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6,Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro 4.0, Reaper 5.9, Sonar Platinum
User avatar
by oddie on Tue Nov 07, 2017 2:11 pm
Thanks for preparing that signal flow diagram. I'll print it out and study it!
User avatar
by oddie on Wed Nov 08, 2017 12:05 pm
I've done a test using the following settings:

1) Tape MT on sub-bus and CTC-1 on master
2) CTC-1 on sub-bus and Tape MT on master
3) Tape VST on buses and CTC-1 on master
4) Tape VST on tracks and CTC-1 on master

I tested these settings twice, once with conservative settings and once with more extreme settings for Tape and CTC-1.

Results (to my ears and on one particular song!):

On gentle settings the difference between 1) and 2) were negligible, 3) and 4) were warmer and more compressed with greater effect on 4).

On more extreme settings the difference between 1) and 2) was quite noticeable. Tape first generally provided more warmth/compression and CTC-1 first provided more bite/presence (using the Tube Console). The differences between 3) and 4) were less noticeable with extreme settings.

I didn't try printing the Tape MT for individual tracks. I'm sure this would provide similar results to Option 4) but complicates the workflow and reduces flexibilty so I didn't bother.

What is the best routing? Seems to be 'horses for courses'. Whichever effect you want more of (tape or console) should go first in the routing. I suppose, there is no reason why you couldn't use Tape VST as well as Tape MT (eg by putting Tape VST on the master bus).

Option 4) probably provides a workflow most similar to recording to multitrack tape (although it would have gone through a console before it gets to the tape!) and then mixing through a console but this needs to be traded off against the simplicity of using Tape MT, or Tape VST on buses only. I think, although it is somewhat less convenient, I will plump for primarily using option 4 as I prefer the sound this produced generally, and it provides maximum flexibility of use for both Tape and CTC-1. I may well vary this on particular songs if they need a different feel (eg Heavy Metal would probably benefit from the additional bite of the Tube Console).

The ideal situation, for convenience, would be if two, or more, MixFX could be run in series on an individual bus and I would certainly use it in this fashion if it could. Is there any chance of this workflow on a future update? Is it worth starting a feature request for this?
User avatar
by brettgoodkin on Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:56 am
jpettit wroteAttached please find a five page manual explaining the MIx FX Flow and Presonus's console emulation plugin offering. It is merged/normalized content from all known sources (article or videos) of data on the topic.
I addition it includes Presonus vetta diagrams to explain the signal flow logic in simplest terms.
Update 1.21 Includes stacking of third party and Presonus Mix FX and Softube Tape Multitrack paramater discription, and fixes to pass-through logic.
Image

Enjoy
Version 1.0 (1.38 MiB) Downloaded 179 times
Version 1.1 (1.63 MiB) Downloaded 91 times
Studio One Pro Mix Engine FX and Plugins Explained 1.21.pdf

Here Marcus explains the passthrough option on Mix FX in a 12 minute video.
This is often miss understood and is the point of version 1.21 of the handbook.
Put simply Mix-FXs are mutually exclusive. The source process component of the MIx FX cannot coexist with another Mix-FX source processing. They can be stacked at the bus channel so Mix-FX can be stacked but not run concurrently on the same source track.
This is shown in all the flow diagrams but explicitly called out in the flow diagrams on page 6.

phpBB [video]


JP,

Where is the mix fx taking signal from each track... Pre or post fader?

I've been doing this longer than you... Win10... S1 pro latest version... 64 bits... Rme latest drivers... All the ram and i7 monster... I'm only adding this info to speed up answers to my queries as it's torturous to have a thread stop in its tracks because the 1st response is always "give me all your info before I then tell you to pound sand". Xoxo
User avatar
by jpettit on Sun Dec 03, 2017 9:14 am
The pre amp component is Pre everything in the channel.

But there is also a summing part the is pre bus fader. So that one is in essence post everything coming to it.

1) For HELP Read the Manual.
2) Create a SUPPORT TICKET. "Select Submit a Request".
3) For Comunity Help add your specs to your SIGNATURE AND.
Include: 1) One Sentence Description 2) Expected Results 3) Actual Results 4) Steps to Reproduce
Detailed how to HERE.

My Website, Free Studio One Advance Training
SPECS:Win 10 64-bit, 12 Core i7: 32Gb DDR4 ram, 40" 4K monitor, StudioLive 24, Quantum, Faderport16, Central Station Plus, Sceptre 6,Temblor T10, Eris 4.5, HP60, Studio One Pro 4.0, Reaper 5.9, Sonar Platinum
User avatar
by brettgoodkin on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:01 am
jpettit wroteThe pre amp component is Pre everything in the channel.

But there is also a summing part the is pre bus fader. So that one is in essence post everything coming to it.


Thx!!

I've been doing this longer than you... Win10... S1 pro latest version... 64 bits... Rme latest drivers... All the ram and i7 monster... I'm only adding this info to speed up answers to my queries as it's torturous to have a thread stop in its tracks because the 1st response is always "give me all your info before I then tell you to pound sand". Xoxo
User avatar
by stephenkorst on Tue Jan 02, 2018 8:27 pm
oddie wrotewhereas previously I had been trying to beat tracks into submission with those tools to try and get everything to sit correctly).


I think we've all been there...I know, I certainly have!

HP Envy, Win 10 64-bit, 6th Gen i7-6500U Dual Core: 16G DDR3L SDRAM, Audiobox USB, Roland A-300 Pro, Line 6 HD500, Studio One Pro, Sonar Platinum, Reaper

soundcloud.com/stevekorst

34 postsPage 2 of 2
1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron