What I have now is an HP 27" monitor. It's fine with reading glasses, but I have room (and a little cash) for a bigger one. (see my specs below, and it's fair to mention that I'm HDMI and just using the i5 video, I'll elaborate why if you feel the need) I'd really like something where I can see better (I'm old
![]() ![]() Not that long ago, much of the software I was using wasn't compatible with larger screens. In fact I tried a 30some inch screen and it looked like POOP. "Allegedly" , this isn't the case anymore and plugs/hosts (I use the Reason Rack quite a bit) have been updated to address this issue. BUT, I don't really know ![]() So, am I blowing into the wind, or is this a feasible thing considering my specs? |
I went from side x side 22" 1920s to a 43" 4K quite a while ago. I chose this size to keep the PPI the same, so that on screen stuff would appear the same size at the distance.
43" is physically too large for me. I end up using the lower 2/3s most of the time ![]() I've been eye-balling the 30-32" range options, but I'm not ready to jump yet. |
just set it to the scaling you'd like. my 4k 27" is set up to 250% scaling, my 24" 1440p is set to 150%, I think.
seriously, try that before investing in one more monitor. yeah, scaling problems were a thing in the past, but now it's been some years since everything should work. provided, you don't have some ancient unsupported OS, Studio One or plugins. if you'll have a problem, just support a bug report to the vendor, but hopefully you won't. I think, you weren't referring to Mac, as on Apple's side it's a bit more tricky. on the PC side the last scaling problems I've seen were years ago. |
jBranam wrotethinking about a 27" 1440p myself well, it really depends on your eyes, but you might find out, this combination 'looks like poop' as the OP noticed with some 30" monitor (I hope, it wasn't a 1080p. those exist). if you want good text rendering, 4k for 27" is pretty nice. 1440p is kinda acceptable for 23-24", but compared to a more high-resolution display you'll notice the text looking mushy. a 27" QHD might have been the state of art in 2011, but a decade later we have much better displays. the whole 'retina' thing is a decade old, in fact. don't get a low-resolution display, in fact, a high-resolution display with scaling set up to your taste will give you better image quality. you just need to try it once and you'll believe. but also please note that getting a monitor with resolution beyond the capabilities of your video adapter or HDMI version also makes no sense, so a 8k 27" might be worse than a 4k. but provided your system can run a 4k display (and you're on the PC side), the 4k is a sweet spot for 27-30". |
Yeah, as far as "looks good" , it's hard to beat this monitor. BUT even with reading glasses, some things are like "WTH am I looking at here?????? "
![]() It's great that so many plugs give size options but I do struggle at times (it sucks to get old ![]() They "say" I have 20/20 vision, CLEARLY (pun? ) they do not take into consideration how small and fine some things are! ![]() |
I use a 34" Curved 4K Samsung Monitor with 125% scaling and Studio One looks fantastic on it.
Using Studio One 6 (Always the latest version)
System i9 9900K, 64GB RAM, 2080TI, 34" 4K Display & 55" 4K Professional Display, Windows 10 Studio I/O Lewitt LCT-440, Yamaha HS7, PreSonus Studio 1824c, Beyerdynamics DT1990, Audio Technica M50X Studio Gear Arturia Keylab 88 MK2, Atom Pad, Atom SQ Instruments Cordoba GK Studio, Takamine GJ72CE, Godin Session, Yamaha F310 R&B Singer / Songwriter / Producer Website |
Fornicras wroteI use a 34" Curved 4K Samsung Monitor with 125% scaling and Studio One looks fantastic on it. I use a similar monitor (34” curved LG) with 100% scaling. Either way, the larger monitor is a joy. |
Been using my trusty 40inch Samsung TV for S1 for 5 years now.
In the market now for a newer 4K Smart TV to replace it as this Samsung is circa 2009. Won't go back to a normal computer monitor now.
DAW: Studio One Pro 6.0.2.91029 | Host OS: Windows 10 Pro 22H2 | Motherboard: ASUS ProArt z490-Creator | CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-10600K | RAM: Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB | Graphics: Intel UHD 630 (HDMI) | Audio Interface: RME UCX II (v1.221) | OS Drive : Samsung 970 EVO+ (500GB) | Media Drive: Samsung 860 EVO (500GB) | Storage 1 : Samsung 970 EVO+ (2TB) | Storage 2 : Seagate FireCuda (2TB) | Monitoring: Presonus Monitor Station v2 + Presonus Eris 5 | MIDI Control: Native Instruments Komplete S61 & Presonus ATOM
|
reggie1979beatz wroteYeah, as far as "looks good" , it's hard to beat this monitor. BUT even with reading glasses, some things are like "WTH am I looking at here?????? " you totally missed my main point. set the display scaling in Windows settings right, so everything will be bigger and remain looking nice. if you currently have a 27" 4k, it should be like 200% scaling by default. if you select 300%, it will make everything 50% bigger. |
Yeah, I dunno, it's not looking good. LG is an "ok" brand but my last one literally broke
![]() ![]() Samsung? I have a really old 23" and again, it's "ok" I guess. I REALLY would like an HP again. EDIT: Here's one that might be good: https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/hp-m3 ... hd-monitor Good price too. |
jBranam wrotethinking about a 27" 1440p myself 1440p at 100% Scaling on a 27" panel looks about the same as 1080p at 100% scaling on a 24-25" panel. Considering you can get some 27" UHD (IPS) Displays for $199, these days, I think I'd prefer to go for that and run it at 150-175% scaling - whatever floats your boat. If you do any video editing, definitely go straight to UHD. If you game then that may not be feasible (unless you have some ridiculous GPU or only play casual games). The only reason I'd think about getting a 1440p over UHD at that size, is to get a higher frame rate... cause going back to 60Hz is very noticeable to me. All of my displays and laptop panels are 120-240Hz. Last time I was in Wal Mart, they had WQHD Ultrawide Samsung IPS displays on sale for $229. At that price, kind of a no-brainer if you want to go beyond FHD, but don't feel like running multiple monitors on your desk (waste of power, more heat, etc.). |
On topic, but different take.
I wear glasses. I noticed I was struggling to read some of the parameters on the screen. I measured the distance between my eye and the monitor. When I was getting my next eye-glasses prescription I asked the opthamologist to write me an extra prescription for that distance (which was 36”) and she tested me for that distance and then wrote that. I bought an extra pair of glasses just for working with the monitor. Amazing difference and clarity. I now never use the monitor without those glasses. It’s too good. |
lawajava wroteOn topic, but different take. Now at less than a month to 58 y/o, I HAVE to wear reading glasses when on a computer (you can imagine how bad a cell is ![]() I'm thinking though that the 32 is a step up because I still struggle with some things. For example, many plugs are sizable. But, I like them small so as to not always block the view of the DAW. My hope is for relatively low coinage, this will improve things. I remember going from 24" to 27" was a HUGE difference for me personally. |
lawajava wroteOn topic, but different take. This is so important! In my studio I have got everything at arms length. In a U shape around me. I had two pairs of glasses made. High quality glasses, and by a very reputable optometrist. Get a full test done and get your glasses checked every 2 years as well. Things change. They can customise your glasses any way you want them to operate. The multi lens thing now is the best its ever been, its totally smooth looking through different parts of your lens. The first pair was for my studio use. Focused perfectly in the middle of the lens, everything at arms length. Tilt head down and then look through the top and I can see synths a little further distance away perfectly sharp. Tilt head up and look through the lower section for everything super close to you such as looking down at your console. It's a dream come true. Very slight precise head movements make for every part of your studio being razor sharp. So yes combine that with a decent sized and sharp detailed monitor and things will look quite fantastic. That and good lighting is essential in your studio. All the important stuff lit so you are not straining to see. The second pair is for me watching TV , the distances involved a little longer. Driving, looking at a distance, and also looking down at a book. The second pair was set up for three different viewing functions. It all cost but it's worth every penny though. Makes working in your studio much easier and better and hence nicer and more creative.
Specs i5-2500K 3.5 Ghz-8 Gb RAM-Win 7 64 bit - ATI Radeon HD6900 Series - RME HDSP9632 - Midex 8 Midi interface - Faderport 2/8 - Atom Pad/Atom SQ - HP Laptop Win 10 - Studio 24c interface -iMac 2.5Ghz Core i5 - High Sierra 10.13.6 - Focusrite Clarett 2 Pre & Scarlett 18i20. Studio One V5.5 (Mac and Win 10 laptop), Notion 6.8, Ableton Live 11 Suite, LaunchPad Pro
|
Users browsing this forum: davidlarson6, frankschbel1, gdugan, Hommi, jefflee, Vocalpoint and 25 guests